|
Using the NBO in Pediatric Primary Care in Spain
Dr. Maria José Alvarez Gómez. Pediatrician. Mendillorri Primary Care Health Centre. Pamplona, Spain
I. INTRODUCTION
Since the 1970s, research has demonstrated important links between the quality of early parent-child interaction and child developmental outcomes (Barnard, 2000). Developmental scientists have identified poor caregiving environments as risk factors for children and nurturing parent-child relationships to be protective factors for children, promoting child resiliency and successful developmental outcomes (Tronick, & Gianino, 1986; Tronick, & Weinberg, 1997; Weinberg, & Tronick, 1998; Weinberg & Tronick, 1977). Recent studies have found that responsive caregivers who interpret infant behavior and respond contingently to a child's behavioral cues demonstrate secure attachment relationships (Brazelton, Tronick, Adamson, & Als, 1975; Jaffe, Beebe, Feldstein, Crown, & Jasnow, 2001); both parent and child learn to adapt, modify, and change their behaviors in response to each other which in turn, lead to more successful child developmental outcomes (Cassidy, 1994; Gianino & Tronick, 1988; Sroufe, 1983). In contrast, less nurturing environments may compromise both cognitive and emotional capacities among children (Brazelton & Greenspan, 2000).
Understanding the value of the early caregiving environment in the context of child development, pediatricians need to consider how they can work with families to support and promote responsive, nurturing environments for children, while also respecting the individual needs of the child and the culture of the family. As a primary care pediatrician, interested in a family-centered approach, I have found the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) (Brazelton & Nugent 1995; Keefer, 1995) and the Neonatal Behavioral Observations System (NBO) (Nugent, Keefer, Minear, Johnson, & Blanchard, 2007) to be valuable tools for working with families. The focus of this study is on parents' response to the Neonatal Behavioral Observations (NBO) system in the context of a pediatric primary care visit.
II. BACKGROUND
I work as a primary care pediatrician in Pamplona, Spain. Primary care pediatricians in Spain provide care to children 0-15 years under a universal Health Care system with government sponsored funding. My current caseload consists of 1,048 children.
III. INTERVENTION
In the past year, I administered the NBO with 60 infants during an initial well-care visit. Infant characteristics included:
|
| Infant Characteristics |
Percentage of total children |
| Age (days) |
| 15 |
70 |
| 30 |
25 |
| 60 |
5 |
| Gender |
| Male |
58 |
| Female |
42 |
| Birth Order |
| First born |
70 |
| Not First Born |
30 |
| Gestational Age |
| Pre-term |
10 |
| Full-term |
90 |
| Multiple Birth status |
6.6 (Twins) |
|
|
IV. METHOD
Descriptive data were collected during and following the primary care visit. Videotaped observations of a select group of families were conducted during the visit and all families were asked to complete The Parent Questionnaire of the Brazelton Institute at home, anonymously
|
|
V. RESULTS
The Parent Questionnaire was completed by 72% of parents (88% mothers, 12% fathers). Parent characteristics included:
|
| Parent Characteristics |
Percentage of total parents |
| Education |
| Some college/ Specialized training |
30 |
| College/ Post Graduate Degree |
67 |
| Age (years) |
| 20-30 |
14 |
| 31-40 |
77 |
| 41 + |
9 |
| Primary Language |
| Spanish |
91 |
| Other |
9 |
|
|
Parent Satisfaction
Using a 4-point rating scale (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor), parent satisfaction with the NBO was high. Fifty-six percent of families rated the tool as an "excellent" learning experience. The remaining 44% of participants rated the tool as a "good" experience.
|
|
Parent-Provider Relationship
The perceived quality of the parent-provider relationship was assessed using a 4-point scale (A lot, Quite a Bit, Some, Very Little). All families reported feeling "a lot of confidence and trust" (90.2%) or "quite a bit of confidence and trust" (9.8%) in the NBO provider. Families felt that they could share "a lot" (62.8%) or "quite a bit" (34.9%) of their ideas and participate in the session with the provider. The NBO helped them to communicate and relate to the provider (92.9%).
Parent-Child Relationship
The majority of parents (65%) felt they learned "a lot" about their baby's competencies and learned how their baby communicates through his/her behavior (98%). For them, the NBO helped them understand their baby more (81.4%) and made them feel more equipped to respond to their baby's behavior (90%). Specifically, parents (83.3%) said they learned how to help their baby when crying. Parents reported feeling "a lot" (36.6%) or "quite a bit" (43.9%) closer to their baby during the visit and overall, more confident in their role as parents after the NBO administration (77.5%).
Parent knowledge of child behavior: pre- and post- NBO comparisons
Parents were asked to rate their knowledge of baby's behavior before and after the NBO visit using a scale from 1 ("very little") to 10 ("a lot"). In an effort to examine the impact of the NBO on parent knowledge, multiple t-test analyses were conducted using SPSS 14.0.
Findings showed a significant increase in parent knowledge of child behavior after the NBO visit (M= 8.42, SD=1.07) compared to before the visit (M= 5.86, SD= 1.67) t (42) = -10.948, p = .0001, (two-tailed)
Additional comparisons showed that parents of first-born infants (n=30) demonstrated a significant increase in knowledge of child behavior after the NBO visit (M= 8.37 SD= 1.12) compared to before the visit (M= 5.67, SD= 1.68) t (29) = -8.780, p = .0001 (two-tailed).
Parents of non first-born infants (n=13) also showed a significant increase in knowledge of child behavior after the NBO visit (M=8.54, SD= .96) compared to before the visit (M= 6.31, SD=1.60) t (12) = -7.366, p = .0001, (two-tailed).
However, it should be noted, that due to the small sample size of the latter group, it is difficult to conclude that parents of non-first-born infants experience increased knowledge as a result of the NBO; replication of these findings with more parents would be valuable to determine the true effects of the NBO on parent knowledge of child behavior.
|
|
Figure 2: Increase in parent's knowledge of child behavior after the NBO visit
|
|
|
|
VI. DISCUSSION
Focusing on babies' first interactions with parents is a promising approach for primary pediatric care providers. Creating a therapeutic alliance with parents strengthens these interventions. More specifically, this study shows that the NBO can be used to engage families and support the parent-child relationship, and in turn, improve child developmental outcomes.
The NBO helps health professionals communicate with parents. It seems to facilitate an attitude of respectful listening to parents'; it fosters collaborative interactions with families and promotes the development of a common language with a family that focuses on the child's behavior. Together, these elements reinforce child strengths and support and empower families in their role as parents. As a result, parents are better able to share their ideas and participate in their child's medical visit.
In this study, parents reported learning a lot about their newborns' competencies after the NBO visit. Several parents commented "But
can they already see?" and "Oh, I thought they couldn't see properly; maybe they can see some shadows." when they witnessed their child tracking the red ball or the rattle. More than 81% of families felt that the NBO helped them know their baby more. Similarly, the attachment relationship between child and parent was reinforced when the newborn looked at the parents' face or turned its head toward the parent's voice. Eighty percent of the parents felt closer to their baby as a result of the session. The NBO enabled families to appreciate their child's individual characteristics (i.e. strengths and limitations) and perceive the newborn as a real person.
 |
| Figure 3: Aimar's mother observes how he tracks the ball |
Furthermore, parents said they learned how to interact with and respond to their infant because they realized how the baby communicates through his/her behavior. As a result, parents felt confident and empowered. By observing infant behaviors collaboratively and encouraging parents to respond to those behaviors, the NBO offers parents an opportunity to discover the strengths in their child and in themselves, skills that they can hopefully, take with them and practice at home.
 |
| Figure 4: Pablo prefers mummy's voice |
NBO observations revealed that 5% of newborns cried "a lot" and were difficult to soothe. More over, 10% of the infants did not demonstrate competent state regulation. These findings compare to previously reported statistics (Chess & Thomas, 1996) of "difficult" temperament in the broader population. Infant temperament can have a major influence on parenting. Hypersensitive children with difficult temperaments, who are difficult to soothe are stressful for caregivers. In these situations, parents may experience heightened anxiety, tension and/or negative perception of the child, all of which undermine parental confidence and nurturing caregiving. During times such as these, offering strategies to parents to help them manage their child's behavior can be helpful.
During my visit with parents, if a baby began to cry I would wait for a short while to observe if the infant was capable of self-soothing. If the newborn could not manage to self-regulate on his/her own, I would model different ways of soothing and then encourage the parent to try their own ways. Some manipulated their voice, face and/or posture to comfort the baby while others tried swaddling, rocking, and sucking techniques. For most parents, a crying baby is a sign of their failure as a parent; they feel guilty and responsible for their child's distress. Many parents will ask "What am I doing wrong?" With the NBO, parents are able to discover that newborns are born with self-regulating capacities and that their external support facilitates this skill. Reinforcing the importance of swift, frequent responsiveness to a child's behavior was particularly relevant for families in Spain because of the cultural belief that responding to a crying baby is indulgent and leads to the child being spoiled.
All of child development exists in context (Bronfrennbrenner, 2001; Bronfrenbreener, 2005; Fogel, A., Maria, & Lyra, 1997; Moen, Elder, & Luscher, 1995) and is especially affected by the parent-child relationship (Bigelow, 1999; Bornstein & Bornstein, 1995; Bowlby, 1988; Brazelton, & Cramer, 1990; Bronfrenbrenner, 1986). Helping parents recognize the behaviors of their newborn and the important role they play has implications for child outcomes. As described above, newborn emotional regulation is just one example of how infant behavior can be influenced by the quality of parent-child interactions.
With the NBO, providers are able to guide parents to discover the individual behaviors of the newborn and improve their responsiveness as parents. By establishing a therapeutic alliance with families, providers can transform parent's perceptions of their newborn. Using the strengths of the child, parents redefine the baby. Offering parents strategies for interacting with their child reeducates parents. Showing parents how the newborn can change his/her behavior as a result of their nurturance remediates the infant (Sameroff, 2000).
To conclude, documenting the effectiveness of relationship-based interventions like the NBO is important for both scientists and clinicians alike. This study shows that the NBO approach has a positive effect on the infant and parent and on the development of the infant-parent relationship. In the words of some parents in this study:
- "This first visit to the paediatrician has been a very positive experience. I've felt that my son is somebody really important for the paediatrician. I felt very safe and protected knowing that the paediatrician is interested in many other things besides weight and height."
- "In my case, it has helped me to "name" some of the reactions I had observed in my baby and whose causes I knew by intuition".
- "It has reinforced my confidence as a mother".
- "It also makes you trust more in your paediatrician and, personally I think that, without being less important her help as a doctor, is even more important her capacity to generate parents confidence"
- "We find the new focus of the paediatric visit is more attentive to the individual development of each baby and makes parent's not obsess with numbers regarding weight and height".
- "It's very unusual that our medical system dedicates time to observe and listen and we have to thank the fact that things are not made in a mechanical way but with interest".
- "I think having a clearer idea of the baby's temperament may be very useful".
- "Just some days of life and they are able to do so many things. Sounds, colors, how he focuses the gaze...I couldn't believe it!"
- "More than anything to see how my baby turned to me while I was speaking; even if she was crying..."
- "I think to assess the baby's development in so many aspects is right, so is the fact the visit is so relaxed and we parents feel like participants".
- "A wonderful session"
- "I think it's going to help us very much to communicate with the baby as he's growing up".
Acknowledgements:
Maria Ángeles Nuin Villanueva for her help with statistical analyses.
(Evaluation and Quality Medical Attendance Service of Primary Care in Servicio Navarro de Salud. Pamplona, Spain)
Bibliography
Barnard K.E. (2000). Influencing parent-child interactions for children at risk. In Guralnick M.J. (Ed), The effectiveness of Early Intervention (2nd Edition). Paul H Brookes Publishing Co. Baltimore, Maryland.
Brazelton T.B. and Greenspan S.I. (2000). The irreducible needs of children. What every child must have to grow, learn and flourish. Perseus Publishing. Cambridge,
Massachusetts.
Brazelton, T.B., & Nugent, J.K. (1995). The neonatal behavioural assessment scale. London: McKeith Press.
Brazelton, T.B., Tronick, E. Adamson, L., & Als, H. (1975). Early mother-infant reciprocity. CIBA Foundation Symposium, 33, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Bronfrenbrenner, U. (2001). Human Development: Bioecological theory. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral
sciences (pp. 6963-6970). Oxford: Elsevier.
Bronfrenbrenner, U. (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Cassidy, J. (1994). Emotion regulation: Influences of attachment relationships. In N.A. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Biological
and behavioral aspects. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2-3), 228-249 (Serial no. 240).
Chess S. and Thomas A. (1996). Temperament. Theory and practice. Brunner / Mazel Publishers. New York.
Fogel, A., Maria, C.D.P., & Lyra, J.V. (1997). Dynamic and indeterminism in developmental and social processes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jaffe, J., Beebe, B., Feldstein, S., Crown, C.L., & Jasnow, M.D. (2001). Rhythms of dialogue in infancy: Coordinated timing in development. Monographs of the
Society for Research in Child Development, 66.
Keefer C.H. (1995). The combined physical and behavioural neonatal examination: A parent -centered approach to paediatric care (3rd Edition). In Brazelton TB and
Nugent JK. The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale, Mac Keith Press: London.
Moen, P., Elder, G.H., & Luscher, K. (1995). Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Nugent J.K. (1985). Using The NBAS with infants and their families: Guidelines for intervention. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 85-61557.
Nugent, J.K., Keefer, C., Minear, S. Johnson, L. & Blanchard, Y. (2007). Understanding newborn behavior and early relationships: The newborn behavioral
observations (NBO) system handbook. Brookes Publishing. Baltimore, MD.
Sameroff A.J. and Fiese B.H. (2000). Transactional regulation: the developmental ecology of early intervention. In J.P. Shonkoff & S.J. Meisels. (Eds.), Handbook of
Early Childhood Intervention. Cambridge University Press.
Shonkoff J., Phillips D. (2000). Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development. Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood
Development. National Academy Press. Washington DC.
Sroufe, L.A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaptation in preschool: The roots of maladaptation and competence. In M. Perlmutter (Ed.),
Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 16 (pp. 41-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Tronick, E.Z. & Gianino, (1986). The transmission of maternal disturbance to the infant: In E.Z. Tronick, & T. Field (Eds.), New Directions for Child Development
No. 34. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tronick, E.Z. & Weinberg, M.K. (1997). Depressed mothers and infants: Failure to form dyadic states of consciousness. In L Murray, & P. Cooper (Eds.), Post
partum depression and child development. New York: Guilford Press
Weinberg, M.K. & Tronick, E.Z. (1998). The impact of maternal psychiatric illness on infant development. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59, suppl.2, 53-61.
Weinberg, M.K., & Tronick, E.Z. (1977). Maternal depression and infant maladjustment: A failure of mutual regulation. In J.D. Noshpitz (Ed.), The handbook of
child and adolescent psychiatry Vol. 1. Infants and preschoolers: Development and syndromes. New York: Wiley & Sons.
|
|