|
NEWBORN
BEHAVIOR AND TEMPERAMENT
By Jennifer T. Liske and I. Simona Bujoreanu
The question of the nature and stability of individual differences
among infants and their influence on later personality are issues
that have serious implications for practice in the field of infant
mental health. One clear demonstration of preservation comes from
the research of Kagan and Snidman, which shows that, controlling
for social class and ethnicity, high compared with low reactivity
at four months of age predicts, to a significant degree, the profiles
of shy, withdrawn, sociable and bold behavior patterns, later in
childhood and adolescence (Kagan and Snidman, 1991). High
versus low reactivity at four months of age predicts to a significant
degree, the profiles of shy, withdrawn, sociable and bold behavior
patterns, later in childhood and adolescence. Observations of 4-month-old
infants exposed to visual, auditory, and olfactory stimulation point
to the possible biological bases for the inhibited and uninhibited
profiles of behavior. These behavioral profiles, defined by a combination
of motor arousal and crying, are predictive of inhibited and uninhibited
behavior profiles in infants up to 12 years of age. However, little
is known about the early behavioral signs in the period prior to
four months that might predict high or low reactivity at four months.
The goal of the ongoing study (The relationship between
newborn behavior and temperament is to see if these behavioral
patterns can be identified in the newborn period, and if there is
a relationship between newborn behavioral characteristics and temperament
categories at 4 months of age. One hundred healthy full-term newborns
were assessed on the second day of life with a new
revised standardized behavioral scale, based on the Neonatal
Behavioral Assessment Scale (Brazelton and Nugent, 1995). This standardized
presentation leaves less chance for human variation in the stimuli
presentation, provides a more objective set of newborn behavior
observations, and produces standard scores for newborn behavior
in the immediate postpartum period up to two months of age. At four
months of age, the participants were examined with a temperament
battery (Kagan et al.) measuring behavioral and physiological responses
(cardiac function, and EEG power and asymmetry).
Chi-square analysis of the first 41 infants reveal a significant
relation between newborn crying and soothability measures and patterns
and high/low reactive temperament categories at four months (p<
.05). For instance, newborns that cried a great deal and were difficult
to console were more likely to be classified as high reactive infants
at four months of life, while newborns who cried minimally and were
easy to console, were more likely to be classified as low reactive
infants at four month of age (see attached Table 1). The stability
of these profiles suggests that some babies are born with a high
threshold for excitability and others with a low level of reactivity.
Analysis of the total sample (n=100) will be presented to further
examine the degree to which these newborn differences persist over
time.
By generating performance norms for healthy full term infants evaluated
with the revised scale, this is the first study using newborn standard
scores to measure individual differences. The study is contributing
to the debate of stability of individual behavioral patterns by
using outcome categories of known predictive validity based on direct
behavioral observations and not on parental report. The results
of the study will help professionals and parents understand and
support infants temperament and behaviors, by designing an
environment in which the infants development can thrive.
Table 1. Classification of infants at newborn and at four
months.
|
Four-month Category
Newborn Category
|
High Reactive*
|
Low Reactive
|
Other
|
|
Low Cry
Easy to Soothe
|
1
|
10
|
17
|
|
High Cry
Hard to Soothe
|
6
|
4
|
3
|
|
Total (N=41)
|
7
|
14
|
20
|
x2(2) = 11.0, p < .05
* One High Reactive infant showed an extremely low level of
motor tension and arousal: thus this infant could not be classified
as easy or hard to soothe.
This study is conducted by J. Kevin Nugent, Ph.D., Jerome Kagan,
Ph.D., Nancy Snidman, Ph.D., Jennifer T. Liske, MA, and I. Simona
Bujoreanu, MA.
|