Ab Initio International Fall 2000
Feature Article

Strengthening Resident Education:
A Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics Perspective

João Gomes-Pedro, Paulo Oorn, Ana Partidario, Maria João Mendes, Madalena Folque Patricio, Clinica Universitária de Pediatria, Hospital de Santa Maria (HSM)- Lisboa, Portugal.

I. Abstract
bookcoverCurrent medical perspective recognizes that childhood and adolescent health is embedded within a psychosocial, ecological and ethological context (Bronfrenbrenner, 2001). More simply, it is important to recognize that child health and behavior reflects a dynamic system of cultural, educational and social factors (Brazelton & Greenspan, 2000). From this viewpoint, the field of developmental-behavioral pediatrics has emerged: an ecological approach in medicine intended to diagnose, treat and prevent developmental issues resulting from chronic illness, stresses in the environment, or metabolic, neurological or biochemical causes.

In Portugal, there is little formal education or clinical guidance around this approach, hindering the quality of Pediatrics training. It is important for us to think about how to integrate elements of developmental-behavioral pediatrics into the education of residents for the purpose of improving the quality of Pediatric care for children and families.

In this study, we sought to examine whether Pediatric residents can discriminate and make meaning of newborn behaviors, believing that this type of skill is one necessary ingredient for the integration of developmental-behavioral practice in Pediatrics.

Pediatric residents in the Department of Pediatrics at the Hospital de Santa Maria were individually interviewed and asked to view a film containing excerpts of the Newborn Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS), a tool designed to examine individual differences in the newborn, across various developmental areas like motor, state, and social-interactive systems (Brazelton & Nugent, 1995). Interview data was collected post viewing the film and analyzed using the á posteriori technique.

Results showed that while residents could observe and describe newborn behavior they were less able to assess and describe differences in newborn behaviors presented during the NBAS, in a way that would enable them to provide appropriate guidance to parents. Such findings suggest that Pediatric residents in the Santa Maria Hospital are ill-equipped to evaluate developmental newborn behaviors; as a result, they are unable to provide quality healthcare to children and families. The medical education system in Portugal needs to integrate new, more developmental-behavioral-focused curriculum, such as the NBAS to address this disparity.

II. Introduction
The concept of "Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics" emerged in medical literature about 30 years ago. Since then, the approach has been described in a myriad of editorials, articles, and texts (Holt, McDowell, 1998; Roy, 1995; Mullan, Wolf, Ertel, 1989; Oberklaid, 1988) alongside the growing understanding that psychosocial, ecological, ethological and trans-cultural aspects of a family have an impact on child health.

Using the Newborn Behavioral Assessment Scale (NBAS) as a guideline, we define resident competency as the ability to identify and interpret newborn behaviors according to the following dimensions: motor function, autonomic stability, habituation, range and regulation of states and interactive orientation. To date, in Portugal, the medical educational system does not recognize this developmental-behavioral approach to be a compulsory component for training in neonatology and/or child development.

The goal of this study is to examine how Pediatric residents at the Hospital de Santa Maria in Lisbon, Portugal discriminate and make meaning of newborn behaviors during the NBAS. We hope to demonstrate the effectiveness of using videotaped observations of NBAS examinations as a form of resident teaching in meeting these goals or as a way to help them better understand differences in newborn behavior.

III. Method
Residents (n=18) from the Clinical Universitária de Pediatria at the Hospital de Santa Maria were interviewed by a researcher. During the interview, residents were 1) asked for personal information such as name, age, gender, years of residency, and number/age of their children, 2) given a brief explanation of the methodology used to inform the residents of the goals and objectives of the study and description of the study design and 3) allowed to view a 10-minute film containing images of a pediatrician administering the NBAS with two full-term newborns, one typically developing and one infant who was exposed to material substance use during pregnancy. Residents were blind to the health status of the newborns during the study. In both cases, NBAS behaviors included: sensory awareness, stability of states, autonomous regulation, and soothing/consoling strategies.

Prior to viewing the film, residents were told "You will see images of two babies being examined on the NBAS. After you have seen them, I would like you to talk to me about what you have just seen." Then before each newborn was presented, residents were told "This is the first baby" and then, "This is the second baby." Half of the residents viewed the typically developing child first and then the child who had been exposed to drugs in-utero. The other residents viewed the film in the reverse order. During the discussion following the film, a researcher asked the following questions:

  1. Could you tell me about these two babies that you have just seen?
  2. What differences were there between them?
  3. Mention three aspects that best differentiate the two babies
  4. One of these babies is the child of a drug addict. Which one do you think it is?
  5. Would you like to take one of these babies home with you? Why?
  6. Do you think that these two babies will have the same future?

Responses were recorded and fully transcribed for á posteriori content analysis. Analysis recorded frequency of: recorded units (RU) and number of subjects (N). The frequency of RU captured the number of times a particular topic was mentioned. The frequency of N summarized the number of residents that referred to a particular topic. Together, RU and N frequencies were then, categorized in an attempt to make sense of responses.

Using a qualitative-content analysis approach, based on verbal responses, resident observations were examined and thematically categorized. Four broad categories were derived based on the recorded units.

  • Description of newborn behavior patterns and difference between the two babies
  • Characterizing the baby exposed to drugs in-utero
  • Reasons for adopting one of the babies
  • Predicting the future development of the babies

N frequencies were used as the main factor component to ensure validity of findings, as RU frequencies can be unreliable and subject to individual participant style. N frequencies were not exclusive.

IV. Results
Interview data was collected from 18 residents.

    A. Description of Newborn Behavior Patterns and Difference between the Two Babies

Six infant neurobehavioral categories were observed and identified by residents: motor activity, orientation, state regulation, reflexes, appearance, and environment (see Table 1).

Table 1
Description of Newborn Behavior by Residents

Categories Sub-categories N
Motor Tone 14
Defensive movements 6
Posture 4
Orientation Auditory orientation 13
Reaction to outside stimuli 11
States Range and regulation (calm, irritable) 12
Self quieting (crying) 8
Reflexes Specifically 10
As a whole 10
General appearance 15
Environment 4


The majority of residents were able to describe characteristics of the motor behavior of the infants, specifically commenting on tone and the presence/type of newborn reflexes. Reflexes were observed as a whole (i.e., " presented practically all of the reflexes that we expect") as well as specifically (i.e., " a poor sucking reflex", "did not present the rooting reflex"), depending on the conditions under which assessments were conducted (i.e., duration, number of distractions). Residents' also noted infants' reaction to audible stimuli and state regulation, such as irritability and consolability.

B. Characterizing the Baby Exposed to Drugs In-utero
Based on their neurobehavioral observations, most residents (n=14) were unable to correctly identify which of the infants in the film had been exposed to drugs in-utero. Interestingly, after infant health status was revealed to residents, many documented fewer motor activities and instead, focused on general appearance (i.e., "looks like a sick baby, don't know what from", "looks more normal") and state regulation. A remaining 6 residents felt that there was not enough information to make an accurate diagnosis (see Table 2).

Table 2
Identification and Characterization of the Infant Exposed to Drugs In-utero

Categories Sub-categories N
Motor Tone 6
Defensive movements 0
Posture
Orientation Auditory orientation 5
Reaction to outside stimuli 0
States Range and regulation (calm, irritable) 10
Self quieting (crying) 3
Reflexes Specifically 4
As a whole
General appearance 12
Environment 6


C. Reasons for Adopting One of the Babies
When asked to share their thoughts around hypothetically adopting one of the infants, most residents (n=13) responded that they would consider adoption of the "healthy" infant. One particular response was "Anyone would prefer to have the healthier baby… it has a greater chance of being a normal child." Only two residents considered adoption of the child exposed to drugs in-utero "thinking that he would need help" and "require a parent with a specialized vocation" to manage his condition. Categories of resident responses are presented in Table 3.

Table 3
Reasons for Adopting one of the Babies

Categories N
Adopt the non-addiction baby 13
Wouldn't adopt either 8
Don't know 3
Adopt the baby exposed to drugs in-utero 2
Adopt both 2
D. Predicting the Future Development of the Babies
With regard to the future of the 2 babies, most residents (n=17) were unable to predict (see Table 4), recognizing that many factors influence child development. The difference in health status of the newborns was just one factor.

Table 4
The Future of the Babies

Categories N
Could be similar 14
Difficult to predict 12
Could/would be different 12
Other information needed 5


V. Discussion
It has been documented in recent scientific literature that videotaped observations of pediatric residents is an effective method for assessing resident knowledge and practice (Moon & Gitterman, 2000), but also a useful teaching technique (Baldwin, et al., 1991).

Results from this study, corroborate that videotaped observations are an effective method for teaching residents.

In this study, videotaped observations were conducted to assess the skills of pediatric residents at HSM. A short-interview was conducted with residents to evaluate their knowledge of developmental newborn behaviors and ability to discriminate typical vs. atypical behaviors.

Descriptive analyses showed that the majority of residents successfully identified newborn behavior and reflexes in both babies. However, residents were unable to accurately differentiate between the infants and identify the baby exposed to drugs in-utero, based on their observations; the majority also felt that they could not predict the developmental trajectory for the infants.

The results of this study suggest that residents have some competence for observing and describing behavior, but seem to have limited competency in the area of discrimination and interpretation of typical and atypical newborn neuro-behavior. These findings demonstrate the deficiencies of the current resident education system to adequately prepare practitioners to elicit and understand newborn behaviors. It is clear that the pediatric resident curriculum at the Clinical Universitária de Pediatria at the Hospital de Santa Maria should integrate specific developmental-behavioral oriented opportunities for learning (i.e., NBAS).

Bibliography
Baldwin, S.E., McCarthy, P.L., Forsyth, B.W. et al. (1991). A novel approach to training pediatric primary care residents. Acad Med, 66, 239-241.

Bardin, L. (1997). Analise de conteúdo. Lubeci, Edicões 70.

Brazelton T.B. and Greenspan S.I. (2000). The irreducible needs of children. What every child must have to grow, learn and flourish. Perseus Publishing. Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Brazelton, T.B., & Nugent, J.K. (1995). Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. London: McKeith Press.

Bronfrenbrenner, U. (2001). Human Development: Bioecological theory. In N.J. Smelser & P.B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 6963-6970). Oxford: Elsevier.

Holt, J.M., & McDowell, M.J. (1998). Developmental-behavioral problems in general pediatrics. Journal of Pediatric Child Health, 34, 245-249.

Moon, R.Y., & Gitterman, B. (2000). Let's go shopping: A tool for pediatric resident education. Pediatrics, 106, 223-225.

Mullan, P.B., Wolf, F.M., & Ertel, I.J. (1989). Residents' evaluation of behavioral pediatrics instruction. Medical Education, 23, 447-452.

Oberklaid, F. (1988). Post graduate training in pediatrics: Analysis of deficiencies as perceived by pediatricians. Aust Pediatric Journal, 24, 11-17.

Roy, L.P. (1995). Survey on developmental-behavioral training experiences of Australian pediatric advanced trainees. Journal of Pediatric Child Health, 31, 362-364.


PreviousTable of ContentsNext Article